[97637] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: The Choice: IPv4 Exhaustion or Transition to IPv6

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Lynda True (aka Etaoin Shrdlu))
Thu Jun 28 15:22:44 2007

Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 12:07:48 -0700
From: "Lynda True (aka Etaoin Shrdlu)" <shrdlu@deaddrop.org>
To: Nanog <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <20070628171528.5308145055@ptavv.es.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu


Kevin Oberman wrote:

>>From: Stephen Wilcox <steve.wilcox@packetrade.com>
>>    
>>
>> I wasnt specifically thinking of reclamation of space, I was noting a
>> couple of things:
>>
>>- that less than 50% of the v4 space is currently routed. scarcity will presumably cause these non-routed blocks to be:
>> :- used and routes
>> :- reclaimed and reassigned
>> :- sold on
>>    
>>
>Some of it, but a large part of the "missing" space belongs to the US
>Government, mostly the military. It is very much in use and is routed
>carefully such that it does not show up in the public Internet.
>  
>

There's another set of missing space, here. It seems to be the elephant 
in the room. While I can't (or won't) speak to the routing issues 
mentioned in the thread, I wonder that no one has brought up all the 
legacy space that is held by a few large conglomerates. No, I'm not 
talking about AT&T, here. I refer to the early days, when class B 
networks were handed out like penny candy, and when organizations could 
get class C space equivalent to a class B. When Company A has, say, 5 or 
6 of those, and then acquires Company B, and then C and D, and all of 
them have that same allotment, it becomes a non-trivial amount of space. 
If there's really only 5 or 6 big companies, where there used to be 50 
or so, we are suddenly talking about a non-trivial amount of space.

Unfortunately, there's no good way to make them give it up. When you can 
see that they could easily make do with a single /8 (or less), it's 
rather sad that we don't have a mechanism in place that punishes for 
greed, and rewards for surrender of unused (or at least completely 
unnecessary) space. I only know about the industry I came from, of 
course, and I suspect that the lion's share of over-allocation is in it. 
I rather doubt that such things as banking, which came late to the 
table, have that characteristic. I know it's not a permanent answer, but 
it seems that (unlike the black space over on milnet et al) there's a 
temporary reprieve to exhaustion in there somewhere.

-- 
The more sand has escaped from the hourglass of our life,
the clearer we should see through it.
      Niccolo Machiavelli 


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post