[97627] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: The Choice: IPv4 Exhaustion AND Transition to IPv6
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Douglas Otis)
Thu Jun 28 14:15:20 2007
In-Reply-To: <p0624080fc2a99971a367@[172.16.1.4]>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
From: Douglas Otis <dotis@mail-abuse.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 10:41:03 -0700
To: chuck goolsbee <chucklist@forest.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On Jun 28, 2007, at 10:06 AM, chuck goolsbee wrote:
>
>> 6. Economists call this a collective action problem. Traditional
>> solutions include legislation, market leadership, and agreements
>> among small actors to achieve such leadership.
>
> You left out: The "killer-app."
>
> Compelling content *only* available via the alternative technology.
> The IPv-ONLY google/porn/web/tube/iphone/whatever that enough
> people want/desire/need/are-willing-to-pay-for to move the network
> to IPv6.
Would that be Teredo and a proprietary PNRP?
http://blogs.msdn.com/p2p/archive/2007/03/22/teredo-and-the-pnrp-
global-cloud.aspx
Figuring out how maintain security without a hierarchical namespace,
or a trackable address space represent sizable concerns. Would
controlling teredo.ipv6.microsoft.com become essential?
-Doug
