[97431] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Thoughts on best practice for naming router infrastructure in DNS

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (randal k)
Thu Jun 14 13:03:38 2007

Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 10:56:54 -0600
From: "randal k" <nanog@data102.com>
To: "Olsen, Jason" <jolsen@devry.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <98F5E905089EBF4191775CBCD439A8021E366D@OBT-W-EVS2P.dvuadmin.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu


------=_Part_36432_14189638.1181840214323
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

On 6/14/07, Olsen, Jason <jolsen@devry.com> wrote:
>
>
> Neither one of these seems well-equipped to deal with "virtual"
> interfaces such as an ethernet interface that is VRRP or HSRP'd between
> two routers (eg x.x.x.10 is your "virtual" IP for the subnet's gateway,
> router 1 has physical interface IP of x.x.x.8 and router 2 has x.x.x.9).


This particular issue has been confounding to work around as well. The issue
of constantly updating DNS to match the current topology is a pain, but in
my opinion, very necessary.

randal

------=_Part_36432_14189638.1181840214323
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 6/14/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Olsen, Jason</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:jolsen@devry.com">jolsen@devry.com</a>&gt; wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>Neither one of these seems well-equipped to deal with &quot;virtual&quot;<br>interfaces such as an ethernet interface that is VRRP or HSRP&#39;d between<br>two routers (eg x.x.x.10 is your &quot;virtual&quot; IP for the subnet&#39;s gateway,
<br>router 1 has physical interface IP of x.x.x.8 and router 2 has x.x.x.9).</blockquote><div><br>This particular issue has been confounding to work around as well. The issue of constantly updating DNS to match the current topology is a pain, but in my opinion, very necessary.
<br><br>randal<br></div><br></div><br>

------=_Part_36432_14189638.1181840214323--

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post