[97230] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Security gain from NAT
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Sam Stickland)
Mon Jun 4 19:14:57 2007
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 23:34:30 +0100
From: Sam Stickland <sam_mailinglists@spacething.org>
To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <20070604205243.GB25996@hezmatt.org>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
Matthew Palmer wrote:
> I can think of one counter-example to this argument, and that's
> SSL-protected services, where having a proxy, transparent or otherwise, in
> your data stream just isn't going to work.
Not so. Look at: http://muffin.doit.org/docs/rfc/tunneling_ssl.html
S
