[97170] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 transition work was RE: NANOG 40 agenda posted
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (matthew zeier)
Mon Jun 4 01:57:49 2007
Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 22:58:37 -0700
From: matthew zeier <mrz@velvet.org>
To: John Curran <jcurran@mail.com>
Cc: Igor Gashinsky <igor@gashinsky.net>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <p06240806c2890d5e42f9@[192.168.3.65]>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
John Curran wrote:
> Best of luck with it; load-balancers aren't generally hiding
> in ISP's backbones and it hasn't been major revenue for
> the traditional router crowd. Net result is there hasn't
> been much IPv6 attention in that market...
I suppose, but certain places like Mozilla, would be dead in the water
without load balancers. Citrix got their act together and shipped 8.0
with v6 vips on the front talking to v4 servers on the backend.
Rock on Citrix.
