[97161] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Sun Jun 3 20:46:08 2007
To: Donald Stahl <don@calis.blacksun.org>
Cc: Igor Gashinsky <igor@gashinsky.net>,
Alexander Harrowell <a.harrowell@gmail.com>,
Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>,
John Curran <jcurran@istaff.org>, nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 03 Jun 2007 15:35:29 EDT."
<20070603152821.N50910@calis.blacksun.org>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 20:43:48 -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
--==_Exmh_1180917828_6149P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Sun, 03 Jun 2007 15:35:29 EDT, Donald Stahl said:
> That said- your v6 support does not have to match your v4 support to at
> least allow you to begin testing. You could set up a single server with v6
> support, test, and not worry about it affecting production.
If I read the thread so far correctly, Igor can't enable a single server
with v6, because the instant he updates the DNS so an MX for his domain
references a AAAA, that will become the preferred target for his domain
from the entire IPv6 world, and he's gonna need a load balancer from Day 0.
--==_Exmh_1180917828_6149P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFGY2BEcC3lWbTT17ARAi0yAJ9BHhEZ975QDnfwgcSIq7I+peB81gCgyJxG
oqxt5uWgjaheySnAk2IIMWM=
=nHOW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1180917828_6149P--
