[97125] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Nathan Ward)
Sat Jun 2 05:15:19 2007
In-Reply-To: <4660F546.6040105@psg.com>
From: Nathan Ward <nanog@daork.net>
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 21:14:29 +1200
To: Nanog <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On 2/06/2007, at 4:42 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>> the average number of v4 prefixes per AS is ~10, and it's rising. In
>> v6, the goal is that every PI site can use a single prefix**, meaning
>> the v6 routing table will be at least one (and two or even three
>> eventually) orders of magnitude smaller than the v4 one.
>
> how much of the v4 prefix count is de-aggregation for te or by TWits?
> why won't they do this in v6?
See slide 24 of:
http://www.2007.apricot.net/presentation/apia-future-routing/apia-
future-routing-vince-fuller.pdf
nearby slides are interesting, too.
--
Nathan Ward
