[97109] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ULA BoF
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy Bush)
Fri Jun 1 18:35:57 2007
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2007 15:34:42 -0700
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Steve Feldman <feldman@twincreeks.net>
Cc: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>, nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <A1BCE859-874D-4C54-B361-64860E3E17EA@twincreeks.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
[ i do not see mail from the respondent. and this reminds me why ]
>>> we still need a operator to make a short summary preso extolling
>>> the virtues of ula central at the bof.
>> How exactly are the opinions of people who operate ISP networks about
>> address space that's never used on the internet relevant?
> 1) He never specified that the operator had to operate an _ISP_ network.
in the words of klaus wirth "i did not run out of ink."
> 2) Even ISP networks have infrastructure which they might not want routed
> on the public Internet.
in fact, the intro speaker is a pro and a carrier. but i don't want to
overload them.
i wonder what the O in nanOg stands for?
randy
