[97093] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 Advertisements
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Iljitsch van Beijnum)
Fri Jun 1 07:51:01 2007
In-Reply-To: <D03E4899F2FB3D4C8464E8C76B3B68B071C227@E03MVC4-UKBR.domain1.systemhost.net>
Cc: <nanog@merit.edu>
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 13:50:00 +0200
To: "<michael.dillon@bt.com>" <michael.dillon@bt.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On 1-jun-2007, at 10:09, <michael.dillon@bt.com>
<michael.dillon@bt.com> wrote:
> I believe that a separate /48 per site is better regardless of whether
> or not the company has contracted with a single ISP for all sites, or
> not. As far as I am concerned if there is a separate access circuit,
> then it is a site and it deserves its own /48 assignment/allocation.
So aggregation is no longer a goal?
