[97065] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 Advertisements
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Iljitsch van Beijnum)
Thu May 31 13:23:37 2007
In-Reply-To: <011301c7a391$50c32460$493816ac@atlanta.polycom.com>
Cc: "Brandon Butterworth" <brandon@rd.bbc.co.uk>,
"North American Noise and Off-topic Gripes" <nanog@merit.edu>
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 19:14:16 +0200
To: Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On 31-mei-2007, at 15:45, Stephen Sprunk wrote:
> The general rule, for both v4 and v6, is that people should filter
> on whatever the minimum allocation/assignment size for each RIR block.
Did someone take the trouble to tell RIPE that?
193/8 /29
194/7 /29
That allows for 6291456 prefixes when fully deaggregated.
> Someone recently posted a link (either on PPML or here -- I can't
> find it now) that showed ARIN's minima for the various v4 and v6
> blocks.
[ALLOCSIZE-APNIC] APNIC, "Allocation sizes within APNIC IPv4 address
ranges", http://www.apnic.net/db/min-alloc.html
[ALLOCSIZE-LACNIC] LACNIC, "LACNIC - Registration Services",
http://lacnic.net/en/registro/index.html
[ALLOCSIZE-RIPE] L. Vegoda, "RIPE-380 Address Space Managed by the RIPE
NCC", June 2006,
https://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-ncc-managed-address-space.html
[ARIN-MICRO] ARIN, "ARIN Micro-allocations",
http://www.arin.net/reference/micro_allocations.html
