[96995] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 Deployment (Was: Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Kevin Loch)
Wed May 30 10:43:30 2007
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 10:41:16 -0400
From: Kevin Loch <kloch@kl.net>
Cc: Nanog <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <20070530101216.P19246@calis.blacksun.org>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
Donald Stahl wrote:
>
> If ARIN is going to assign /48's, and people are blocking anything
> longer than /32- well then that's a problem :)
To be specific, ARIN is currently assigning up to /48 out of
2620::/23.
I noticed that http://www.space.net/~gert/RIPE/ipv6-filters.html
has the following entry in the "strict" list:
ipv6 prefix-list ipv6-ebgp-strict permit 2620::/23 ge 24 le 32
which is not particularly useful. It should be 'le 48' if the
intent is to track RIR assignment policies.
- Kevin
