[9699] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IAHC Plan rejectd by US Gov't
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David R. Conrad)
Fri May 30 12:20:49 1997
To: Vince Wolodkin <wolodkin@digitalink.com>
cc: perry@piermont.com, Paul A Vixie <paul@vix.com>, nanog@merit.edu,
newdom@ar.com, davidc@apnic.net
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 30 May 1997 11:10:33 -0400."
<338EEDE9.85C5A3F@digitalink.com>
Date: Sat, 31 May 1997 00:50:26 +0900
From: "David R. Conrad" <davidc@apnic.net>
Sigh.
>I don't understand how you can deny that the IANA effort is a contracted
>function in the InterNIC contract and that ISI is in this function a
>contractor.
Please spend a bit of time figuring out what the IANA is, how long it
has existed, and how much money NSI paid to support the IANA in the
past.
Hint: Fleming isn't a good source.
But please don't do your research via NANOG.
Thanks,
-drc
