[96932] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Tue May 29 15:47:39 2007
To: "Chris L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow@verizonbusiness.com>
Cc: John Curran <jcurran@istaff.org>, nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 29 May 2007 14:34:59 -0000."
<Pine.GSO.4.58.0705291425380.11314@marvin.argfrp.us.uu.net>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 13:42:48 -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
--==_Exmh_1180460568_5909P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Tue, 29 May 2007 14:34:59 -0000, "Chris L. Morrow" said:
> On Tue, 29 May 2007, John Curran wrote:
> > This changeover will not: 1) Fix the routing problem
> > inherent with present locator/endpoint binding, nor
> > 2) solve your favorite fib/rib/cam/convergence limit,
> > nor 3) make the infrastructure inherently either
> > easier to operate or more secure.
> but ipv6 is more secure, yes? :) (no it is not)
Does the relative security of IVp4 and IPv6 *really* matter on the same Internet
that has Vint Cerf's 140 million pwned machines on it?
Just askin', ya know?
--==_Exmh_1180460568_5909P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFGXGYYcC3lWbTT17ARAhRrAJ9Q+r3p+3z8q1F4e/dsJggKYtK7ZACePlbM
Dfnh8qY5LukD5sT1mxnqbQc=
=Pdp+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1180460568_5909P--
