[96924] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 Advertisements
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Donald Stahl)
Tue May 29 15:00:50 2007
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 13:10:17 -0400 (EDT)
From: Donald Stahl <don@calis.blacksun.org>
To: "William F. Maton Sotomayor" <wmaton@ryouko.imsb.nrc.ca>
Cc: "Chris L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow@verizonbusiness.com>,
nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705291140280.20179@ryouko.imsb.nrc.ca>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
> f-root does this on the IPv6 side: 2001:500::/48
>
> Whether that's available everywhere on IPv6 networks, is as Bill pointed-out,
> another question.
One of the root servers not being available everywhere seems like a pretty
lousy idea :)
On another note- are there any folks on the list who haven't at least
started testing v6- either in a lab or on their home network? Is there a
particular reason why?
Does anyone have any horror stories about deploying v6? (Aside from
problems with tunnels resulting from A and AAAA records for the same
host). With rare exceptions every transition I've read about has been
pretty painless.
There seems to be so much resistance to v6 and a lot of it seems to be
misunderstanding or misinformation regarding the complexity of the
changes.
-Don