[96898] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: NANOG 40 agenda posted
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (michael.dillon@bt.com)
Tue May 29 12:11:15 2007
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 16:22:56 +0100
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0705291450431.11314@marvin.argfrp.us.uu.net>
From: <michael.dillon@bt.com>
To: <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
> > > For core links it should IMHO be mostly possible to keep them
> > > IPv4/IPv6
> > > dual-stack.
> >
> > What's wrong with MPLS in the core and 6PE at the edge?
> >
> > Right there you have two possible tactics that are worthy of being=20
> > publicly discussed and compared.
>=20
> stewart bamford gave a good presentation about this very=20
> thing 4 nanogs ago (or maybe 5)> There are some support=20
> issues to keep in mind of course.
Perhaps it was this one?=20
http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0510/pdf/bamford.pdf
Note that Level3 did choose to use 6PE for their deployment rather than
dual-stacking.
--Michael Dillon
