[96893] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy Bush)
Tue May 29 11:27:11 2007
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 05:08:07 -1000
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: John Curran <jcurran@istaff.org>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <p06240802c281c694fbc2@[192.168.3.65]>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
> (*) Anyone advocating staying with IPv4 and relying
> on NAT and market demand as an alternative
> needs to consider the completely deaggregated
> address usage pattern (and routing table explosion)
> that results.
not that i think this a nice approach or anything, but ...
it would seem that the size of the routing table in this case, as in
others, is proportional to the number of end sites, pi multi-homed if
that is the dominant policy, or pa aggregated if that is the dominant
policy.
randy
