|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 09:35:54 -0700 (PDT) From: "william(at)elan.net" <william@elan.net> To: "Chris L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow@verizonbusiness.com> Cc: Nathan Ward <nanog@daork.net>, nanog@nanog.org In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0705271527270.11314@marvin.argfrp.us.uu.net> Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu On Sun, 27 May 2007, Chris L. Morrow wrote: >> So, I think I can sum up your reply by saying that your suggestion is >> to provide a lesser service than we do now (v4 NAT, proxies, etc. >> sound to me like lesser service), during the transition period. > > I think you also missed the suggestion that sending out CPE with DD-wrt > was a 'good idea'. Honestly DD-wrt/open-wrt are nice solutions for testing > or for people willing to fiddle, they are not a good solution for > 'grandma'. My parents and brother both have linksys with dd-wrt that I put up. I don't maintain it at all and it "just works". No, they are not using v6, but if it was available I don't anticipate any problems as their system os at home all support it now. -- William Leibzon Elan Networks william@elan.net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |