[96756] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ISP CALEA compliance
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Thu May 24 00:44:43 2007
To: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists@gmail.com>
Cc: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>,
Albert Meyer <from_nanog@corenap.com>,
Martin Hannigan <hannigan@gmail.com>, nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 24 May 2007 09:01:26 +0530."
<bb0e440a0705232031r17b1f0fag2119143d39ff88ea@mail.gmail.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 00:34:14 -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
--==_Exmh_1179981254_3868P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Thu, 24 May 2007 09:01:26 +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian said:
>
> On 5/24/07, Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> wrote:
> > The more I think about this, the more I think a refereed
> > boxing^h^h^h^h^h^hpanel discussion between representatives
> > from DHS, FBI, EFF, FCC, Verisign, Neustar, and ITU might
> > be a good approach to this.
>
> Humor me.. but just where does ITU come into this whole mess?
The ITU itself is likely irrelevant. However, those who run ISPs across
either the left or right puddle are likely to be hit with CALEA-like issues
within the next few years, when their countries adopt similar laws. And those
who think the EU's stand on privacy of data will prevent a CALEA should
consider the sorts of data-retention proposals that are getting floated
over there.
Yes - the laws themselves are politics. Being able to install compliant
routers without breaking the budget is totally operational... ;)
--==_Exmh_1179981254_3868P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFGVRXGcC3lWbTT17ARAjx4AJ9bYqE0txetFXmW5dBoTUplPrat+wCfbiJ8
rYXi/GszjUUEdL/N/v2fPZE=
=T2K+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1179981254_3868P--
