[96710] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: motivation for routing a bit of 44.0.0.0/8
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Mon May 21 21:24:02 2007
To: Neal R <neal@lists.rauhauser.net>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 21 May 2007 19:49:49 CDT."
<46523E2D.2030505@lists.rauhauser.net>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 21:23:06 -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
--==_Exmh_1179796986_5557P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Mon, 21 May 2007 19:49:49 CDT, Neal R said:
> Set up a separate SSID exclusively for HAM use. Use IPsec AH -
> cryptographically signed traffic keeps the unlicensed out without
> breaking the no payload encryption requirements. City gets help with the
> civil defense radio of the 21st century, HAMs get a new toy, and
> everyone is happy. Sure, there are security concerns, but the interface
> to the outside world is a proxy server HAMs can use while doing storm
> watch and such ... nobody gets in or out without a note from the FCC ...
> Or am I making this just a bit too simple?
The hams might be OK on it. The city probably won't be thrilled unless
you can find a way to get their legal staff to sign off on it. Remember,
most lawyers aren't geeks, and will judge a proposal on a different basis
than geeks do.
--==_Exmh_1179796986_5557P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFGUkX6cC3lWbTT17ARAkXHAKClV1++V7tl6YAOiY/64xRzX0kamACfRpuk
euWUN1WuobkhR8RFOa9IzAA=
=sQVJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1179796986_5557P--
