[96616] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ATT <-> Broadwing (Level3) Congestion
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Brandon Galbraith)
Wed May 16 14:17:40 2007
Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 13:14:09 -0500
From: "Brandon Galbraith" <brandon.galbraith@gmail.com>
To: "NANOG list" <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <366100670705161009l25482c60lbacdb17a1f3afcc8@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
------=_Part_21544_27463306.1179339249317
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
On 5/16/07, Brandon Galbraith <brandon.galbraith@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Is anyone else seeing significant congestion between ATT and Broadwing in
> Dallas/Fort Worth?
>
> -brandon
>
Thanks to all who responded privately as well as publicly. It looks like the
problem has been resolved at the peering/transit point in question.
-brandon
------=_Part_21544_27463306.1179339249317
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
On 5/16/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Brandon Galbraith</b> <<a href="mailto:brandon.galbraith@gmail.com">brandon.galbraith@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<div><span class="gmail_quote"></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Is anyone else seeing significant congestion between ATT and Broadwing in Dallas/Fort Worth?<br><span class="sg"><br>-brandon<br>
</span></blockquote></div><br>Thanks to all who responded privately as well as publicly. It looks like the problem has been resolved at the peering/transit point in question.<br><br>-brandon<br>
------=_Part_21544_27463306.1179339249317--
