|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
In-Reply-To: <2573.87.84.237.87.1179326109.squirrel@webmail-test.pelican.org> Cc: "Joe Maimon" <jmaimon@ttec.com>, "nanog" <nanog@merit.edu> From: Marshall Eubanks <tme@multicasttech.com> Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 10:59:24 -0400 To: "Tim Franklin" <tim@pelican.org> Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu On May 16, 2007, at 10:35 AM, Tim Franklin wrote: > > On Wed, May 16, 2007 2:20 pm, Joe Maimon wrote: >> >> What should I expect? >> >> I am seeing ~350 from a vendor provided mpls cloud to a site in >> >> Sukhrali Chowk, Gurgaon, Haryana, India > > Seems not-unreasonable. I remember getting about 150ms or 250ms from > London to Gurgaon depending on whether we were on the straight-across > cable or the round-the-bottom cable. (Sorry, both my geography and my > cable-names are hazy). The best recent data I have is from Bangalore to Tyco Road in Virginia through VSNL and Cogent. Here is a sample (this goes through San Jose) : Mon Mar 5 05:26:21 EST 2007 from Bangalore through the VSNL network --- 63.105.122.1 ping statistics --- 10 packets transmitted, 10 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 285.495/319.649/395.330/38.576 ms 370 ms seems a little high but not unreasonable. Regards Marshall Eubanks > > Going east from NY, you'd add 70 or 80ms to that - and a quick look > suggests routes going west instead. (Test from home to .IN NS goes > London > -> NY -> West Coast -> Singtel -> India, for ~370ms) > > It's starting to head a bit towards walkie-talkie mode for VoIP, > but not > too bad other than that... > > Regards, > Tim. > >
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |