[96574] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Juniper M10i sufficient for BGP, or go with M20?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Donald Stahl)
Mon May 14 19:58:43 2007
Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 19:57:49 -0400 (EDT)
From: Donald Stahl <don@calis.blacksun.org>
To: Kinkie <nanog@kinkie.it>
Cc: Neal Rauhauser <neal@lists.rauhauser.net>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <1179180294.6364.11.camel@loki>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
> Strange. My rep always took pride in the fact that M- and T- series
> devices have no overcommit at all.. Maybe things changed, we use no
> quad-gig.
Many of Junipers cards for the M7/M10 are oversubscribed- just look at
their pdf's on the subject:
http://www.juniper.net/products/modules/100044.pdf
http://www.juniper.net/products/modules/100163.pdf
> I'm very happy about the Juniper devices I manage. They're expensive but
> very reliable, and their config interface has lots of unique features.
Juniper's greatest asset over Cisco is the single software image for all
their systems. In my latest purchase that didn't justify paying 4 times as
much no matter how much I love the software.
-Don
