[96552] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Juniper M10i sufficient for BGP, or go with M20?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Donald Stahl)
Sun May 13 21:57:41 2007
Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 21:55:26 -0400 (EDT)
From: Donald Stahl <don@calis.blacksun.org>
To: "Chris L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow@verizonbusiness.com>
Cc: Neal Rauhauser <neal@lists.rauhauser.net>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0705140126010.25256@marvin.argfrp.us.uu.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
>> choice. Layout here is such that I'd expect to use a single quad gigabit port
>> ethernet blade in each of a pair of M10i/M20 to achieve redundancy.
>
> he said 'blade' to which I read '4 pics in a FPC'... maybe it's a
> terminology thing? Neal?
The M10i doesn't have an FPC blade per se (it's built into the chassis) so
in the context of the M10i I assumed "single quad gigabit port ethernet
blade" meant a single card- though I could definitely be wrong. My
knowledge of the Juniper line is sadly pretty limited.
-Don
