[96428] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ISP CALEA compliance
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jason Frisvold)
Thu May 10 14:51:25 2007
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 14:48:35 -0400
From: "Jason Frisvold" <xenophage0@gmail.com>
To: "Patrick Muldoon" <doon@inoc.net>
Cc: "Jared Mauch" <jared@puck.nether.net>,
"Nikos Mouat" <nikm@cyberflunk.com>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <3FA5EDF9-279F-445E-980B-7034A3FD8CD1@inoc.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On 5/10/07, Patrick Muldoon <doon@inoc.net> wrote:
> We've been under the impression that is *all* data. So for us,
> things like PPPoE Sessions, just putting a tap/span port upstream of
> the aggregation router will not work as you would miss any traffic
> going from USER A <-> USER B, if they where on the same aggregation
> device. Since the Intercept has to be invisible to the parties
> being tapped, you can't route their traffic back out and then in
> either, since the tap would change the flow. In that regard, we've
> been upgrading our older NPE's to newer ones in order to support
> SII, All the while I keep having something a co-worker said stuck in
> my head. "CALEA - Consultant And Lawyer Enrichment Act" :)
Agreed.. Now to dig into the legal document to see if this is right..
Anyone have a legal gibberish to english converter? (And no, a lawyer
doesn't count)
> -Patrick
--
Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold
XenoPhage0@gmail.com
http://blog.godshell.com
