[96238] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IP Block 99/8 (DHS insanity - offtopic)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Tue Apr 24 11:13:06 2007
To: michael.dillon@bt.com
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 24 Apr 2007 12:34:25 BST."
<D03E4899F2FB3D4C8464E8C76B3B68B03BE97C@E03MVC4-UKBR.domain1.systemhost.net>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:10:57 -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
--==_Exmh_1177427457_4511P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 12:34:25 BST, michael.dillon@bt.com said:
> Did that. The first three are from J. Oquendo, Valdis Kletnieks and
Hey - I stayed out of the signed-BGP and signed-DNS lunacy. The only thing *I*
commented on was the reported leakage of 10 to 20 terabytes of data. And I
think we can all agree that filters and firewalls that leak terabytes of data
qualify as "operational" (the topic, not the filters).
(I'm going to ignore the alternate interpretation, that Chinese downloaded that
much *open* data from NIPRNet, along with multiple (unreported) terabytes of
open data from Akamai, CNN, Apple's iTunes, and hundreds of other similar data
sources. After all, conflating secure and open data like that in order to
"create" an issue would be just.... wrong.. :)
--==_Exmh_1177427457_4511P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFGLh4BcC3lWbTT17ARAqN/AKCo+tEeBsj4PXIHfdxUJZpM+GdNuACePstC
cFYtqOjnhlycTp7M/Ec1gc4=
=Kxns
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1177427457_4511P--
