[96214] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IP Block 99/8 (DHS insanity - offtopic)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (bmanning@karoshi.com)
Mon Apr 23 22:38:07 2007
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 02:34:31 +0000
From: bmanning@karoshi.com
To: Sandy Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com>
Cc: mike@sentex.net, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <20070423212303.3E67F3F45D@pecan.tislabs.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 05:23:03PM -0400, Sandy Murphy wrote:
>
> You might try taking a look at the various presentations at NANOG/RIPE/ARIN/
> APNIC/APRICOT about the whole idea. Central point: the entity that gives
> you a suballocation of its own address space signs something that says you
> now hold it.
>
> No governments involved.
>
> --Sandy Murphy
no problemo... when i hand out a block of space, i'll expect
my clients to hand me a DS record ... then I sign the DS.
and I'll hand a DS to my parent, which they sign.
That works a treat.... today (if you run current code)
and gives you exactly what you describe above.
Oh, you want the prefix attestation to be used for soemthing
other than attestation as to whom holds a given prefix?
you wnat to attest to the "routability" of said prefix?
thats a bit more than a simple attestation of responsibility,
IMHO of course.
--bill
