[95993] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Thoughts on increasing MTUs on the internet
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David W. Hankins)
Thu Apr 12 18:38:44 2007
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 15:31:52 -0700
From: "David W. Hankins" <David_Hankins@isc.org>
To: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <7.0.1.0.2.20070412181425.067eca58@senie.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
--rqzD5py0kzyFAOWN
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 06:18:56PM -0400, Daniel Senie wrote:
> Neither addresses interoperability on a multi-access medium where a=20
> new station could be introduced, and can result in the same MTU/MRU=20
> mismatch problems that were seen on token ring and FDDI.
Solving Ilijitsch's "#1" is a separate problem, and you can solve
them in isolation. If you chose to do so, "#2" is already solved
for all hosts where dynamic configuration is desirable.
--=20
David W. Hankins "If you don't do it right the first time,
Software Engineer you'll just have to do it again."
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc. -- Jack T. Hankins
--rqzD5py0kzyFAOWN
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGHrNYcXeLeWu2vmoRAv7ZAJkBGUSZBLhLTc0EhvYNwf3BZ8Dj6ACfRSVu
hdFBMzhdb8zZjB3gV2ExaEM=
=hFxm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--rqzD5py0kzyFAOWN--
