[95922] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joseph S D Yao)
Tue Apr 10 11:07:56 2007
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 11:07:25 -0400
From: Joseph S D Yao <jsdy@center.osis.gov>
To: michael.dillon@bt.com
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Mail-Followup-To: michael.dillon@bt.com, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <D03E4899F2FB3D4C8464E8C76B3B68B025DD1F@E03MVC4-UKBR.domain1.systemhost.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 10:30:32AM +0100, michael.dillon@bt.com wrote:
...
> I also find it curious that you claim to have people on staff at your
> company who know what SWIP means. Perhaps you could ask them to share
> that information with us since I have never seen this documented
> anywhere. Do they really know what you claim they know?
...
http://www.swip.com/: Scottish Widows Investment Partnership
http://www.uh.edu/~cfreelan/SWIP/: Society for Women in Philosophy
http://www.sat-tel.com/Swip.html: Shared WHOIS Project
http://www.swip.net/: The Swedish IP Network
Note that there are far more entries for chapters of SWIP #2 than for
any others. But one may assume that you refer to SWIP #3.
Definitions on the Web found by Google do vary slightly. The referenced
InterNIC policy appears to no longer be available on the InterNIC Web
site. However,
<http://www.arin.net/registration/guidelines/report_reassign.html>
will do.
There seem to have been more proposals on how to produce a better WHOIS
then one can assume in a reasonable amount of time. ;-]
--
Joe Yao
Analex Contractor
