[95899] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (michael.dillon@bt.com)
Mon Apr 9 16:40:50 2007
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 21:39:26 +0100
In-Reply-To: <20070407.145134.701.978515@webmail15.lax.untd.com>
From: <michael.dillon@bt.com>
To: <nanog@merit.edu>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
> I would have to respectfully disagree with you. When network
> operators do due diligence and SWIP their sub-allocations, they
> (the sub-allocations) should be authoritative in regards to things
> like RBLs.
How do you tell when they have actually done "due diligence".
Existence of a SWIP record is essentially meaningless in this day and
age. Many people do them automatically and there may well be nobody left
on staff who knows that this is happening or what it all means.
--Michael Dillon
