[95875] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mikael Abrahamsson)
Sun Apr 8 01:46:19 2007
Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 07:44:21 +0200 (CEST)
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <59F6BA45-CF59-45BD-9209-280EDCEB4CB1@hubris.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On Sat, 7 Apr 2007, Chris Owen wrote:
> And how do you know the difference? The Cox IP address is SWIPed. Its
> even sub-allocated. The allocation is just a /19.
Exactly, so why not just block whatever the suballocation is? Would mean
that companies that properly SWIP their IP-blocks and put in the effort to
maintain them, are given an advantage to companies that do not.
--
Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se
