[95810] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: summarising [was: Re: ICANNs role]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Warren Kumari)
Wed Apr 4 12:58:51 2007
In-Reply-To: <D03E4899F2FB3D4C8464E8C76B3B68B025D3E4@E03MVC4-UKBR.domain1.systemhost.net>
Cc: <nanog@merit.edu>
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 12:56:57 -0400
To: "<michael.dillon@bt.com>" <michael.dillon@bt.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On Apr 4, 2007, at 11:57 AM, <michael.dillon@bt.com>
<michael.dillon@bt.com> wrote:
[SNIP]
>
> That is really a separate issue. This discussion is about limiting the
> damage caused by domains which do rapid NS switching. If we know which
> domains are new, DNS operators could put them on probation and only
> allow a minimum TTL of 1 day on those names.
All that this means is that domains will be registered and sit idle
(or host a web server for domain parking, useless content to make it
look legitimate, etc.) until the probation period is up. Then it be
converted into a rapid NS switching domain used for whatever...
> The domain owner can still
> switch NSes but the queries won't chase him, therefore he will sell
> less
> product and quickly stop doing NS switching. If he's not NS switching
> then it is easier to track him down, blackhole him, filter him,
> whatever.
>
> --Michael Dillon
>
