[95777] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: ICANNs role [was: Re: On-going ...]

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Donald Stahl)
Tue Apr 3 13:41:51 2007

Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 13:35:24 -0400 (EDT)
From: Donald Stahl <don@calis.blacksun.org>
To: John Levine <johnl@iecc.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org, jgreco@ns.sol.net
In-Reply-To: <20070403144948.57190.qmail@simone.iecc.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu


>
> Well, you're not likely to get it for the $8.95 that Godaddy charges.
> Their abuse department does a remarkably good job, considering their
> volume and margins.
>
> Perhaps the message here is that you get what you pay for.  For a rock
> bottom price, You get rock bottom service.  There are registrars that
> charge considerably more and provide considerably more service.
The problem here is that the community gets screwed not the guy paying 
$8.95. If he was getting what he paid for- well who cares. The problem is 
everyone else.

That said- even if domains were more expensive it wouldn't change anything 
for the phishers using their stolen credit cards.

There simply needs to be a better way for the community to quickly 
identify phishing sites- verified by some independent body (such as CERT) 
that can quickly verify the domain is a phishing site and alert the 
registrars to shut them down. Don't let it be used for copyright or any 
other non-sense complaint.

-Don

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post