[95777] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ICANNs role [was: Re: On-going ...]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Donald Stahl)
Tue Apr 3 13:41:51 2007
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 13:35:24 -0400 (EDT)
From: Donald Stahl <don@calis.blacksun.org>
To: John Levine <johnl@iecc.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org, jgreco@ns.sol.net
In-Reply-To: <20070403144948.57190.qmail@simone.iecc.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
>
> Well, you're not likely to get it for the $8.95 that Godaddy charges.
> Their abuse department does a remarkably good job, considering their
> volume and margins.
>
> Perhaps the message here is that you get what you pay for. For a rock
> bottom price, You get rock bottom service. There are registrars that
> charge considerably more and provide considerably more service.
The problem here is that the community gets screwed not the guy paying
$8.95. If he was getting what he paid for- well who cares. The problem is
everyone else.
That said- even if domains were more expensive it wouldn't change anything
for the phishers using their stolen credit cards.
There simply needs to be a better way for the community to quickly
identify phishing sites- verified by some independent body (such as CERT)
that can quickly verify the domain is a phishing site and alert the
registrars to shut them down. Don't let it be used for copyright or any
other non-sense complaint.
-Don