[95599] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: On-going Internet Emergency and Domain Names
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Fergie)
Sat Mar 31 19:50:44 2007
From: "Fergie" <fergdawg@netzero.net>
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 23:36:27 GMT
To: dotis@mail-abuse.org
Cc: frnkblk@iname.com, nanog@merit.edu
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
- -- Douglas Otis <dotis@mail-abuse.org> wrote:
>On Sat, 2007-03-31 at 16:47 -0500, Frank Bulk wrote:
>> For some operations or situations 24 hours would be too long a time t=
o
>> wait. There would need to be some mechanism where the delay could be
>> bypassed. =
>
>What operation requires a new domain be published within 24 hours? Eve=
n
>banks require several days before honoring checks as protection against=
>fraud. A slight delay allows preemptive enforcement measures. It seem=
s
>most if not all operations could factor in this delay into their
planning.
>
Doug and I completely agree on this issue.
So again, I ask: When does a policy breakdown become an operational
issue?
I would posit that it does when criminals are able to abuse the
system.
Would love to arguments to the contrary.
- - ferg
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.6.0 (Build 214)
wj8DBQFGDvB3q1pz9mNUZTMRAo1VAJ9rOisFN1xm4PjJsqUOeuSIWjy+OwCgpLQm
gU76B10LtNBWYrE9/JjiQ+U=3D
=3DvxKU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
Engineering Architecture for the Internet
fergdawg(at)netzero.net
ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/
