[95398] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: SaidCom disconnected by Level 3 (former Telcove property)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Frank Bulk)
Fri Mar 16 22:00:38 2007
Reply-To: <frnkblk@iname.com>
From: "Frank Bulk" <frnkblk@iname.com>
To: <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 20:59:14 -0500
In-Reply-To: <DEA063E646F3804CA5541C01B0E1D484CBFE11@nt1.MUTUALTEL.MTCNET.NET>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
I've been working at a smaller ISP (~4000 subs, plus businesses), and not
one has asked me if I'm multi-homed.
When we or our upstream provider have a problem the telephones light up and
people act as if it's a problem, but the reality is that they're not
communicating it, up front, as a business requirement.
Frank
-----Original Message-----
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 8:54 PM
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: SaidCom disconnected by Level 3 (former Telcove property)
Almost ALL?
Any company, or any person for that matter, that relies on their
Internet connectivity for their lively hood should be multihomed.
-wil
On Mar 16, 2007, at 4:42 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
> Almost ALL providers should be multihomed.
>
> --Mike
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu] On
> Behalf Of
> virendra rode //
> Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 11:26 AM
> To: NANOG
> Subject: Re: SaidCom disconnected by Level 3 (former Telcove property)
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Frank Bulk wrote:
>> http://www.phillyburbs.com/pb-dyn/articlePrint.cfm?id=1310151
>>
>> Is this a normal thing for Level 3 to do, cut off small, responsive
>> providers?
>>
>> Frank
> - ------------------------
> Just curious, should "small responsive providers" should be multi-
> homed?
>
>
>
> regards,
> /virendra
>
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFF+XOApbZvCIJx1bcRAtkwAJ9vNak3F8FlCf9VDycf6IlAr445nACg59kB
> w2OWAGdchd2XQyxxgZWQaug=
> =Yb1+
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
