[9525] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Murkowski anti-spam bill could be a problem for ISPs

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (J.D. Falk)
Mon May 26 04:11:33 1997

Date: Mon, 26 May 1997 03:57:30 -0400
From: "J.D. Falk" <jdfalk@cybernothing.org>
To: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <19970526034330.11148@cybernothing.org> [9705.26]

On Mon, May 26, 1997 at 03:43:30AM -0400, J.D. Falk wrote:

> My personal favorite is the simple fact that while this law may not stop
> 100% of what we currently consider spam, it will seriously reduce the amount
> without making it any harder to try other methods to stop the rest.

	Correction: I'm talking about Smith's bill in the above
	paragraph; Murkowski's is simply awful.  Sorry about any
	confusion.

 ---------========== J.D. Falk <jdfalk@cybernothing.org> =========---------
  |     "When that what now is yet to be has come to pass,               |
  |      thou shalt realize that thy existance 'tis merely another       |
  |      building block upon that edifice which we call reality."        |
  |                                --Pink Floyd (paraphrased)            |
 ----========== http://www.cybernothing.org/jdfalk/home.html ==========----

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post