[94886] in North American Network Operators' Group
Fwd: death of the net predicted by deloitte -- film at 11
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Alexander Harrowell)
Mon Feb 12 11:57:53 2007
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 16:15:23 +0000
From: "Alexander Harrowell" <a.harrowell@gmail.com>
To: nanog <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <a2b2d0480702120813r132e46cdgb848983ac2db3d5d@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
------=_Part_79157_20639094.1171296923629
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Alexander Harrowell <a.harrowell@gmail.com>
Date: Feb 12, 2007 4:13 PM
Subject: Re: death of the net predicted by deloitte -- film at 11
To: Paul Vixie <vixie@vix.com>
Paul, that's very interesting. A query:
"AMT Site: A multicast-enabled network not connected to the multicast backbone
served by an AMT Gateway. It could also be a stand-alone AMT Gateway."
Should that read: a multicast-enabled network, not connected to the
multicast backbone, served by an AMT Gateway? It looks like it from the meat
of the RFC.
On 12 Feb 2007 06:14:00 +0000, Paul Vixie <vixie@vix.com> wrote:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mboned-auto-multicast-00 is what i
> expect. note: i've drunk that koolaid & am helping on the distribution
> side.
> --
> Paul Vixie
>
------=_Part_79157_20639094.1171296923629
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
<br><br>---------- Forwarded message ----------<br><span class="gmail_quote">From: <b class="gmail_sendername">Alexander Harrowell</b> <<a href="mailto:a.harrowell@gmail.com">a.harrowell@gmail.com</a>><br>Date: Feb 12, 2007 4:13 PM
<br>Subject: Re: death of the net predicted by deloitte -- film at 11<br>To: Paul Vixie <<a href="mailto:vixie@vix.com">vixie@vix.com</a>><br><br></span>Paul, that's very interesting. A query:<br><br>"AMT Site
<span style="font-family: monospace;">: </span>A multicast-enabled network not connected to the multicast<span style="font-family: monospace;"> </span>backbone served by an AMT Gateway. It could also be a stand-alone AMT Gateway."
<br><br>Should that read: a multicast-enabled network, not connected to the multicast backbone, served by an AMT Gateway? It looks like it from the meat of the RFC. <div><span class="e" id="q_110b6ba832a9f62f_1"><br><br>
<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 12 Feb 2007 06:14:00 +0000,
<b class="gmail_sendername">Paul Vixie</b> <<a href="mailto:vixie@vix.com" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">vixie@vix.com</a>> wrote:</span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mboned-auto-multicast-00" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mboned-auto-multicast-00</a> is what i
<br>expect. note: i've drunk that koolaid & am helping on the distribution side.
<br>--<br>Paul Vixie<br></blockquote></div><br>
</span></div>
------=_Part_79157_20639094.1171296923629--
