[94502] in North American Network Operators' Group
IAB Workshop on Routing and Addressing [Was: Re: Google wants to be yo
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Fergie)
Wed Jan 24 13:14:13 2007
From: "Fergie" <fergdawg@netzero.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 17:50:13 GMT
To: jml@packetpimp.org
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
- -- Jason LeBlanc <jml@packetpimp.org> wrote:
>...Some days it kills me that v6 =
>is still not really viable, I keep asking providers where they're
>at with it. Their most common complaint is that the operating
>systems don't support it yet. They mention primarily Windows since
>that is what is most implemented, not in the colo world but what the
>users have. I suggested they offer a service that somehow translates
>(heh, shifting the pain to them) v4 to v6 for their customers to move
>it along.
>
If you *really* want to know where things with IPv6, then you need
to read this:
Report from the IAB Workshop on Routing and Addressing
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-iab-raws-report-00.txt
- - ferg
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.5.2 (Build 4075)
wj8DBQFFt5xMq1pz9mNUZTMRApvtAKCSIwmfi4ISc8jFg7yHgt2rlrK+7gCgyHiY
/ukrrvZTVFL52zm7eu2ZuZs=3D
=3DOtBi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
Engineering Architecture for the Internet
fergdawg(at)netzero.net
ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/
