[945] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: links on the blink (fwd)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Sean Doran)
Thu Nov 9 01:30:51 1995
To: curtis@ans.net
cc: Alan Hannan <alan@gi.net>, scharf@vix.com (Jerry Scharf),
D.Mills@cs.ucl.ac.uk, michael@memra.com, nanog@merit.edu
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 09 Nov 1995 01:01:28 EST."
<199511090601.BAA02136@brookfield.ans.net>
Date: Thu, 09 Nov 1995 01:23:44 -0500
From: Sean Doran <smd@chops.icp.net>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>>> "Curtis Villamizar" == Curtis Villamizar <curtis@ans.net> writes:
Curtis Villamizar> In message
Curtis Villamizar> <199511082323.RAA20836@gaijin.mid.net>, Alan
Curtis Villamizar> Hannan writes:
>> The update I just got on the MAE-E /"Sprint" problem seems
>> rather timely to the discussion.
>>
>> " We have hit the point where BGP processing on SprintLink
>> routers can no longer survive moderate fall-overs. There is no
>> fix for this, except: a/ people MUST withdraw as many prefixes as
>> possible b/ the background route-flap MUST be reduced
Curtis Villamizar> You could also take routing from the RA route
Curtis Villamizar> servers. This would solve your problem. I think
Curtis Villamizar> this was mentioned at the last NANOG meeting so
Curtis Villamizar> it is not a new solution either.
Curtis Villamizar> Curtis
First you will have to explain to me how taking routing
from the RA route server would help avoid a collapse
of my iBGP mesh...
Sean.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
iQCVAwUBMKGeZESWYarrFs6xAQEwjAQAkugBRZUv1JBIYVKRDNTPChmNwjiOUIaT
3R5a0PHKiiCBldg+wkW9Qf/6zx7YKYg3KZMJyNwfUVgeuoVTfJ/poL2IbNt9PZRz
GA1PDh8sSpqf6abrI17rug0Zo84PCHuL2Oltd404uxaIV6zgAkNPvUi4KnQrnpP6
IYbDpyRUlFc=
=e3bY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Process pgp-proc killed
