[94473] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Google wants to be your Internet
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Adrian Chadd)
Tue Jan 23 18:39:13 2007
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 07:38:11 +0800
From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@creative.net.au>
To: "Chris L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow@verizonbusiness.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0701231847160.3626@marvin.argfrp.us.uu.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007, Chris L. Morrow wrote:
> I have an electic company, it's got 2500 partners, all with the same
> 'internal ip addressing plan' (192.168.1.0/24) we need to communicate, is
> NAT on both sides really efficient?
I've seen plenty of company setups that double/triple-NAT due to administrative/
security boundaries.
The majority of them seem to be government organisations too. :)
Adrian
