[9436] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Root Name Server Confederations
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Marc Hurst)
Wed May 21 03:14:57 1997
Date: Wed, 21 May 1997 02:28:07 -0400 (EDT)
From: Marc Hurst <mhurst@fastlane.ca>
To: w0zz <wozz@wookie.net>
cc: Ben Black <black@zen.cypher.net>, Paul A Vixie <paul@vix.com>,
"'nanog@merit.edu'" <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.3.95.970520220455.3870B-100000@big>
On Tue, 20 May 1997, w0zz wrote:
> On Tue, 20 May 1997, Marc Hurst wrote:
>
> > >
> > > their being operational makes them no less bogus. IANA says who answers
> > > for "." and eDNS aint it.
> >
> >
> > Not only is that restraint of trade, I would like to see you make that
> > defense stay in a court outside of the US.
> >
>
> Yeah, and then we can go after that horrible 800/888 number monopoly
It is within your right to challenge the ITU.
>
> http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Factsheets/fs_800.htmlhttp://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Factsheets/fs_800.html
> http://www.sms800.com
>
> And those darn frequency allocations the fcc (aka 'THE MAN') is using to
> keep us (aka 'THE OPPRESSED') down.
Same as above....
>
> I think anyone should be able to make up their own 800 numbers and
> broadcast on any frequency they wish.
>
> I think i'll open a new high powered broadcast station in the public
> safety band. Hey, its my right!
Have Carribean Oil Derrick... will travel....
>
> DOWN WITH ORDER, UP WITH PEOPLE!
More like give people what hey can manage themselves....
>
> \w0zz
>
>
