[94301] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 section of ARIN Number Resource Policy (Sec 6.5.1.1.c)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Pekka Savola)
Wed Jan 17 12:08:13 2007
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 19:05:47 +0200 (EET)
From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
To: nantoniello@antel.net.uy
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <Pine.WNT.4.62.0701171415520.3408@nyquist>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text,
while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.
--1589707168-1477987446-1169053547=:14543
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
On Wed, 17 Jan 2007, Nicolás Antoniello wrote:
> A /28 prefix may have a lot of incoming traffic associated to it, so I
> believe the dissagregation (subnets) of the prefix should be allowed by the
> policy.
>
> What do you think? Do you have a similar problem?
Please achieve inbound load balancing on other, less
network-stressful, ways. At least one way to do so to examine what
can be done to influence your upstreams' (and recursively if
applicable) route preferences (e.g., using communities).
--
Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
--1589707168-1477987446-1169053547=:14543--
