[9423] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Root Name Server Confederations
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (w0zz)
Wed May 21 00:23:07 1997
Date: Tue, 20 May 1997 22:08:17 -0600 (MDT)
From: w0zz <wozz@wookie.net>
To: Marc Hurst <mhurst@fastlane.ca>
cc: Ben Black <black@zen.cypher.net>, Paul A Vixie <paul@vix.com>,
"'nanog@merit.edu'" <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSD/.3.91.970520224555.9940E-100000@fastlane.ca>
On Tue, 20 May 1997, Marc Hurst wrote:
> >
> > their being operational makes them no less bogus. IANA says who answers
> > for "." and eDNS aint it.
>
>
> Not only is that restraint of trade, I would like to see you make that
> defense stay in a court outside of the US.
>
Yeah, and then we can go after that horrible 800/888 number monopoly
http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Factsheets/fs_800.htmlhttp://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Factsheets/fs_800.html
http://www.sms800.com
And those darn frequency allocations the fcc (aka 'THE MAN') is using to
keep us (aka 'THE OPPRESSED') down.
I think anyone should be able to make up their own 800 numbers and
broadcast on any frequency they wish.
I think i'll open a new high powered broadcast station in the public
safety band. Hey, its my right!
DOWN WITH ORDER, UP WITH PEOPLE!
\w0zz
