[94035] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Network end users to pull down 2 gigabytes a day, continuously?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Colm MacCarthaigh)
Sun Jan 7 09:27:11 2007
Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 14:15:41 +0000
From: Colm MacCarthaigh <colm@stdlib.net>
To: Marshall Eubanks <tme@multicasttech.com>
Cc: Frank Bulk <frnkblk@iname.com>, nanog@merit.edu
Reply-To: colm@stdlib.net
In-Reply-To: <C142D28D-C824-4452-AE6B-F542B3756376@multicasttech.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 09:09:27AM -0500, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
> >Using AS proximity is definitely a help for resilience though,
> >same-AS sources and adjacent AS sources are more likely to remain
> >reachable in the event of transit problems, general BGP flaps and so
> >on.
>
> Do you actually inject any BGP information into Venice ?
yes and no, there is topology information there, but it's based on
snapshots. Dyanamic is the next step.
--
Colm MacCárthaigh Public Key: colm+pgp@stdlib.net
