|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 16:35:25 -0500 (EST) From: "Justin M. Streiner" <streiner@cluebyfour.org> To: nanog@merit.edu In-Reply-To: <20070104161012.A1526@egps.egps.com> Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu On Thu, 4 Jan 2007, Nachman Yaakov Ziskind wrote: >> 25 11.11.11.2 44 msec >> 26 11.11.11.1 48 msec >> 27 11.11.11.2 48 msec >> 28 11.11.11.1 48 msec > > Yep. Way cool. Unfortunately it's not the first time that: 1) someone with enable screwed up a routing design or did something dumb like dueling static routes, or some similar kind of rubbish. 2) someone with enable (or someone who manages peple with enable) co-opted arbitrary non-1918 IP space for use on their internal network. Calling it RFC1919 space would almost be funny if it weren't such a pain the butt to deal with people who do things like this. jms
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |