[93903] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Quick BGP peering question
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (James Blessing)
Wed Jan 3 08:39:44 2007
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 13:36:26 +0000
From: James Blessing <james.blessing@entagroup.com>
Cc: 'nanog' <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <008801c72f37$481941b0$d84bc510$@org>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Neil J. McRae wrote:
> are you advertising them routes?
> If so then why wouldn't you expect traffic?
>> -----Original Message-----
> Very simply : Would you accept traffic from a customer who insists on
> sending 0
> prefixes across a BGP session?
Expecting the traffic is not a problem, just want some way of verifying that the
traffic isn't malicious/spoofed (e.g. by using unicast RPF or similar)
- --
COO
Entanet International
T: 0870 770 9580
http://www.enta.net/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFFm7FaR+KszLBLUT8RAiD3AJ4u8/MIL3tuaJc2ZLZLJ9EsiKgROACcC9J9
L91GI1SQ4nYDwGhuxDuJBxA=
=4C4p
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
