[93641] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Best Email Time
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Alexander Harrowell)
Sat Dec 9 14:00:35 2006
Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 18:59:19 +0000
From: "Alexander Harrowell" <a.harrowell@gmail.com>
To: "Rich Kulawiec" <rsk@gsp.org>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <20061209184548.GA4190@gsp.org>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
------=_Part_63578_1654093.1165690759327
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
This account sees something over 10x more spam than genuine traffic, almost
all of which is autofiltered.
On 12/9/06, Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 07:50:57AM -0500, David Hester wrote:
> > CNN recently reported that 90% of all email on the internet is spam.
> > http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/europe/11/27/uk.spam.reut/index.html
>
> CNN is behind the times. We passed 90% junk (spam, viruses, bogus virus
> warnings, worms, outscatter spam, C/R spam, etc.) a few years ago.
> Locally, over the last three months, we've been rejecting > 98% of
> incoming
> traffic with just two reported problems from internal and external users.
>
> And almost all of that rejected traffic TCP-fingerprints as originating
> from hosts running Windows.
>
> ---Rsk
>
------=_Part_63578_1654093.1165690759327
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
This account sees something over 10x more spam than genuine traffic, almost all of which is autofiltered.<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 12/9/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Rich Kulawiec</b> <<a href="mailto:rsk@gsp.org">
rsk@gsp.org</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><br>On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 07:50:57AM -0500, David Hester wrote:
<br>> CNN recently reported that 90% of all email on the internet is spam.<br>> <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/europe/11/27/uk.spam.reut/index.html">http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/europe/11/27/uk.spam.reut/index.html
</a><br><br>CNN is behind the times. We passed 90% junk (spam, viruses, bogus virus<br>warnings, worms, outscatter spam, C/R spam, etc.) a few years ago.<br>Locally, over the last three months, we've been rejecting > 98% of incoming
<br>traffic with just two reported problems from internal and external users.<br><br>And almost all of that rejected traffic TCP-fingerprints as originating<br>from hosts running Windows.<br><br>---Rsk<br></blockquote></div>
<br>
------=_Part_63578_1654093.1165690759327--
