[93300] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Verizon PSTN continued
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (virendra rode //)
Wed Nov 8 01:46:50 2006
Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2006 22:45:41 -0800
From: virendra rode // <virendra.rode@gmail.com>
Reply-To: virendra.rode@gmail.com
To: "Chris L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow@verizonbusiness.com>
Cc: Wallace Keith <kwallace@pcconnection.com>,
David Hubbard <dhubbard@dino.hostasaurus.com>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0611071843170.896@marvin.argfrp.us.uu.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Chris L. Morrow wrote:
>
> On Tue, 7 Nov 2006, Wallace Keith wrote:
>
>> Working with 2 other carriers on a similar issue, response I rec'd was
>> congestion due to automated political dialers. Not sure if I believe
>> that or not...
>
> you'd think they'd have systems monitoring that and trimming down the
> 'fat'? or can they do that? (legally I mean, sorta like QOS for the phone
> network I suppose)
- ------------------------
I guess it depends on the type of VoIP deployment.
http://www.softarmor.com/wgdb/docs/draft-camarillo-sipping-sbc-funcs-02.txt
regards,
/virendra
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFFUX0VpbZvCIJx1bcRAqUQAKCwfwsszTIAkMeEtwp0J4g5CxrVIACfYqjD
WNcHEZDbB1o344Ck6h91bbk=
=b/hK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
