[93136] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Extreme Slowness
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (W. Kevin Hunt)
Fri Oct 27 08:38:15 2006
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 07:18:51 -0500
From: "W. Kevin Hunt" <khunt@huntbrothers.com>
To: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <4296C3E5-8F9F-4B5F-8BA1-327C4E4D9C0F@digitalrage.org>
X-MailScanner-From: kevin@hbcorporate.com
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
We peer with UUnet and Telcove (now L3 and being "assimulated")
Latency across Telcove has been terrible (not just routers on the path
with higher than norm latency, but latency all the way to the endpoint)
I have personal opinions as to why the latency is so bad, but until I
can prove something I'd rather not say anything in public.
Some examples : 72.30.33.194 is 60.8 ms away via uunet, it is 109ms away
via Telcove. www.level3.com via uunet is 30ms away, via Telcove it is
55ms away.
Trace to level3.com via UUNet
Hostname
%Loss Rcv Snt Last Best Avg Worst
1. ndcr3-52.datasync.net
0% 6 6 0 0 0 0
2. ndcr6-ndcr3.datasync.net
0% 5 5 0 0 0 0
3. POS1-2.GW4.NOL1.ALTER.NET
0% 5 5 1 0 1 1
4. 501.at-0-0-0.XL2.NOL1.ALTER.NET
0% 5 5 1 1 1 1
5. 0.so-6-2-0.XT1.DFW9.ALTER.NET
0% 5 5 14 14 15 15
6. 0.so-6-0-0.BR6.DFW9.ALTER.NET
0% 5 5 15 14 14 15
7. so-1-0-0.edge1.Dallas1.Level3.net
0% 5 5 16 15 16 17
8. so-1-2-0.bbr1.Dallas1.Level3.net
0% 5 5 16 15 16 16
9. ae-0-0.bbr2.Denver1.Level3.net
0% 5 5 83 29 41 83
10. ge-6-1.hsa1.Denver1.Level3.net
0% 5 5 35 29 31 35
11. 4.68.94.1
0% 5 5 30 30 30 32
12. www.Level3.com
0% 5 5 31 29 30 31
Via Telcove
1. ndcr3-52.datasync.net
0% 5 5 0 0 0 0
2. 64.66.101.89
0% 5 5 7 7 7 7
3. 24.56.107.229
0% 4 4 20 20 20 20
4. ???
5. 24.56.107.94
0% 4 4 20 20 20 20
6. ge-6-23.car1.Atlanta1.Level3.net
0% 4 4 143 20 51 143
7. ae-1-51.bbr1.Atlanta1.Level3.net
0% 4 4 20 20 30 59
8. as-0-0.bbr1.Denver1.Level3.net
0% 4 4 54 53 54 54
9. ge-9-0.hsa1.Denver1.Level3.net
0% 4 4 55 54 54 55
10. 4.68.94.1
0% 4 4 55 54 55 55
11. www.Level3.com
0% 4 4 55 55 55 55
--
W. Kevin Hunt
CCIE #11841
Linux+ SME
"There are 10 kinds of people in this world, those that understand
binary and those that do not."
Elijah Savage wrote:
>
> Adam,
>
> Because of contractual issues it makes it very hard for me to
> participate on this list hence the vague original post. I was just
> asking a general question to see if anyone else was having issues. I
> have peering points with Broadwing(now level3), Sprint, AT&T and MCI(now
> Verizon) that I can test for throughput from.
