[92955] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Collocation Access
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Alex Rubenstein)
Mon Oct 23 13:08:37 2006
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 13:06:05 -0400
From: "Alex Rubenstein" <alex@corp.nac.net>
To: "Craig Holland" <cholland@rnmd.net>, <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
> Is this some new trend or have I just gotten lucky in the=20
> past? Wouldn't someone like AT&T be better served by giving=20
> their employees some company issued ID that they can submit=20
> to secure facilities? I know it wouldn't be government=20
I am shocked that the ATT employee did not have an ATT ID.
In our facilities, we require all visiting telcos to produce company
identification, and between telcove/level 3, Verizon, MCI, and several
others, we have never had an issue.
I'd be a bit more suspicious that he didn't have ATT ID.
--
Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, alex@nac.net, latency, Al Reuben
Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net
=20
