[92820] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: 200K prefixes - Weekly Routing Table Report
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Adrian Chadd)
Fri Oct 13 22:07:00 2006
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 10:08:27 +0800
From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@creative.net.au>
To: Fergie <fergdawg@netzero.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <20061013.171929.20443.1196033@webmail10.lax.untd.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On Sat, Oct 14, 2006, Fergie wrote:
>
> I'll bet you nickels to doughnuts that it won't make much
> of a difference -- in the fact that too may end-ASs originate
> specifics to attempt to "engineer" their traffic....
You could always send those networks a bill for your next BGP-speaking
core upgrade. TCAM entries are expensive y'know.
From what I've seen here and other lists there seems to be a good
financial reason now to aggregate thanks to implementation choices
by vendors and purchasing choices by providers.
Adrian (239k is enough for everyone, or something.)
